The Landlord Protection Agency  
Main Menu, Landlord Protection Agency homepage Membership With The Landlord Protection Agency Free Landlord Services Member Services  
Re: damages v wear and tear - Landlord Forum thread







Free LPA Newsletter







The LPA on Facebook The LPA on Twitter
TheLPA on Facebook & Twitter
Re: damages v wear and tear by John (CA) on November 21, 2009 @16:46
Pretty much ignore everything she has said. Take her to court if she keeps your security deposit. You don't have to scrub down the bath after every use, the way you have used it is pretty clearly wear and tear. Also, landlords can expect to have to refinish (at least screen and recoat) a wood floor every couple of years. The way you have used it is normal wear and tear. Swiffer is fine for cleaning wood floors.

Landlords like your are the reason why California has so many pro-tenant laws.

[ Reply ] [ Return to forum ]

Re: damages v wear and tear by cal renter on November 27, 2009 @02:09 [ Reply ]
The security deposit hasn't even been discussed as she is indicating that we bear the responsibility of restoring the shine on the tub and refinishing the wood floor. I had thought the security deposit was all but lost...

Look-up
Associations
Attorneys
Businesses
Rentals Available
Rentals Wanted
Realty Brokers
Landlord Articles
Tips & Advice
Tenant Histories

Other Areas
About Us
Free Forms
Essential Forms
Landlord Tenant Law
Join Now
Q&A Forum
Credit Reports
Site Help



© 2000-2010 The Landlord Protection Agency, Inc.