|
|
Re: Correction
by OK-LL
on January 30, 2011 @10:48
|
Guess this is a local decision -- I've had CRR tossed when not specifically required because it increases the difficulty of receipt because the recipient must go to the PO or be present when mail is delivered, neither of which is the case with regular US Mail.
|
[
Reply
]
[
Return to forum
]
|
Re: Correction
by Anonymous
on January 30, 2011 @11:31
|
[ Reply ]
|
|
You really think a judge is going to throw out a notice when the post office leaves notice of mailing and who it is from and the reciever just chooses to ignore the notice, that the judge will just treat the notice as if it never happened? I don't know where you've seen a judge say its acceptable, but I would think any judge with all their marbles in tact would say its not
|
Re: Correction
by OK-LL
on January 30, 2011 @18:31
|
[ Reply ]
|
|
Welcome to OK, where we are treated to judgments that follow the letter of the law. And based on the time, trouble and continuances allowed in other states as I've heard described on this forum, I'm happy to be here.
|
|
|
Look-up
Associations
Attorneys
Businesses
Rentals Available
Rentals Wanted
Realty Brokers
Landlord Articles
Tips & Advice
Tenant Histories
Other Areas
Q&A Forum
Free Forms
Essential Forms
Landlord Tenant Law
Join Now
Credit Reports
About Us
Site Help
|