Sara why can't you cite the case law as asked?

Sara why can't you cite the case law as asked? by Anonymous on February 4, 2012 @22:06

QUOTE: Cal Courts have found that 'occupants' is related to those instances of spaces that are used for non living areas such as offices, business's, storage facilities, garages etc. ENDQUOTE

Please cite the case law that found "occupants" is related to spaces that are used for non-living areas...

That would certainly clear things up for this post, wouldn't it?

[ Reply ] [ Return to forum ]

Re: Sara why can't you cite the case law as asked? by Linda (Az) on February 5, 2012 @00:24	[ Reply ]

Why don't you look it up for your self, I'm sure She has better things to do than answer your questions!

To Linda.... by Anonymous on February 5, 2012 @02:14	[ Reply ]

I HAVE looked it up for myself, spending NUMEROUS hours on it, and canNOT find any case law or reference to this, which is why, if Sara is going to put something out there, she should be able to back it up with facts and references. Where is the case law that says "occupants" don't mean people who live in a rental house or apartment???????

Re: To Linda.... by Betty L. (Ca) on February 5, 2012 @11:13	[ Reply ]

Maybe you don't know where to look! It's easily located just where Sara gave the information from. All you have to do is read through all of the code to find what applies to you. If you do not understand, well that's a problem no one can help you with. The usage of the word 'Occupant' does not always refer to a 'tenant' as you seem to believe, but can refer to one such as a corporation or business who utilizes the "Property". The law is clear, if you are required to have fire extinguishers, then you must maintain and service them.

Here are details & link--NOTHING about case law

Re: Here are details & link--NOTHING about case law

In conflict with what Sara posted & reread the OP

Re: In conflict with what Sara posted & reread the OP

Re: In conflict with what Sara posted & reread the