Re: Angi (pa) - Landlord Forum thread

Re: Angi (pa) by Anonymous on April 9, 2012 @11:48

I don't see where there was any rudeness involved. Just simple statements of fact and opinion. Here's another: why don't we require temporary chemical castration of all welfare recipients -- you want a check, you come in for a shot so you can't reproduce until you have the ability to support your offspring. And let's limit welfare assistance to the able-bodied, make it a 5-year program with 4 years for education or training programs and 1 year to work with assistance, then it's up on your own two feet, no more help, sink or swim. See, just an opinion, and no rudeness to it.

[ Reply ] [ Return to forum ]

Re: Angi (pa) by Anonymous on April 9, 2012 @22:41	[ Reply ]

this chemical temporary castration i like;)But we can face another problem:)We can have a line of woman and man who will apply for Welfare just for Birth Control purpose :)I like education program and helping to find a job:)5 years of FS? hmm what about those who try and try to get a job and cannot because of light duties?in some age it is difficult just change a profession. But i understand your point- Welfare is to easy.When i was posting about welfare i hope you paid attention.I was posting about my friend who wanted to come back to her country but than she could loose her SSD .The amount of SSD would be sufficient in her country but not here..Leaving US of course she is giving up welfare -and this is right she does not live here she is not taking it ...but she was working for SSD, paid taxes and SS.So she stayed here.She cannot work (handicapped)she gets FS,medical assistance,and section 8...How much money she could save to Government living outside US and having just SSD.This is what i call paradox.And another-you are going to like this one--there is free woman's clinics for low incomes-they getting BCP,pap smear, mammograms and check ups for free...but not if they are castrated...YES!