Free Landlord Newsletter
FREE BONUS Forms Disk for
2 -5 year LPA Members
LPA Discounts!
FREE Sign Up
|
 |
|
Re: Tortious Interference or not
by Anonymous
on June 20, 2012 @05:09
|
|
Give the tenant a thirty day notice that the house is no longer for rent.....
|
|
[
Reply
]
[
Return to forum
]
|
|
Re: Tortious Interference or not
by Doug
on June 20, 2012 @09:29
|
[ Reply ]
|
|
|
|
It's not retaliation, since the tenant violated the clause in the lease that says the landlord can show the property. It's a simple lease violation.
|
|
Re: Tortious Interference or not
by Anonymous
on June 20, 2012 @10:28
|
[ Reply ]
|
|
|
The buyer has no right of entry without the landlord present also. How would the tenant know it's the buyer and not someone else.
Proper notice to enter does not garantee entry, the tenant still has the right to refuse. The landlord issuing a 30 day notice to vacate would be viewed as retaliation because the tenant refused entry. The correct and legal reaction would be to issue a 'notice to cure' and only if the tenant still refused entry should the landlord move for termination of the lease.
Simple lease violations do not rise to the level that a 30 day notice to end lease would be appropiate. But then, some landlords over react without thinking it through.
|
|
|
Look-up
Associations
Attorneys
Businesses
Rentals Available
Rentals Wanted
Realty Brokers
Landlord Articles
Tips & Advice
Tenant Histories
Other Areas
Q&A Forum
Free Forms
Essential Forms
Landlord Tenant Law
Join Now
Credit Reports
About Us
Site Help
|
