|
|
Unfortunately, it doesn't matter
by CCRider (CA)
on March 24, 2015 @17:54
|
I think your cause is noble. But, not a winning one.
Any dog that might be confused with a pit bull, is a dog that will not be wanted by a landlord. That's all that really matters.
Someone could always get a doggie DNA test to prove it does not have any restricted breed DNA.
But, unfortunately, many landlords that do still accept dogs, are simply side-stepping the issue altogether by just saying dogs must be 25 pounds or less.
And you'll also have to lobby insurance companies to insure pit bulls and pit bull mixes.
Good luck to you.
|
[
Reply
]
[
Return to forum
]
|
Re: Unfortunately, it doesn't matter
by Anonymous
on March 24, 2015 @18:22
|
[ Reply ]
|
|
Well, I appreciate your honest response.
We ( as you may have guessed) have two APBTs. They are really loving dogs, although we did our due diligence. They are well-socialized, obedient, and very friendly low key dogs.
However, I do understand your position. Especially, when not everyone is a responsible owner.
In case it mattered to anyone, State Farm insures APBTs, as that is who we have.
Thank you for your input!
|
Re: Unfortunately, it doesn't matter
by Anonymous
on March 25, 2015 @00:24
|
[ Reply ]
|
|
I have a pretty pitty too -- an 70 lb. American Staffordshire Terrier. Very sweet dog who loves people -- and can catch a kill a varmint in seconds flat (an especially good mouser)! Loves my cats, too! And in my state, State Farm does not have a so-called dangerous dog list nor do they bar insurance based on any breed; they base insurance on the status of the dog -- if it has a bite history or has been tagged as aggressive by the city/county (meaning it has acted in a manner that required city/county involvement, such as biting), it will affect insurance coverage.
|
Re: Unfortunately, it doesn't matter
by Anonymous
on March 24, 2015 @21:46
|
[ Reply ]
|
|
Landlords are doing what is necessary for their neighbors consideration and to protect their property. Limiting pets to under 30 pounds is not "sidestepping" the issue; it limits the extra wear, tear, risk and load placed on a SFH by an 85 pound pitt bull or rotweiler. I am willing to considered any mixed breed but if it weighs 90 pounds you are going to pay 3X my non-refundable pet fee. That stops these tenants and sends them to a landlord that doesn't know any better, one that doesn't run credit checks, criminal checks, etc.
|
Re: Unfortunately, it doesn't matter
by Anonymous
on March 25, 2015 @10:14
|
[ Reply ]
|
|
Wow. That is a very prideful and arrogant statement from you.
" That stops these tenants and sends them to a landlord that doesn't know any better, one that doesn't run credit checks, criminal checks, etc."
As if all American Pit Bull Terrier (and the like) owners had bad credit and a criminal background.
Of which my husband and myself have neither, nor do the vast majority of APBT owners.
Careful, with blanket statements like the above,your ignorance is showing.
|
Re: Unfortunately, it doesn't matter
by J (FL)
on March 25, 2015 @10:17
|
[ Reply ]
|
|
Well personally I think it kind of shows a lack of common sense to own an animal like that which 90% of LL's won't accept, when you're trying to rent. Maybe you should buy a house where you can do what you want.
|
|
|
Look-up
Associations
Attorneys
Businesses
Rentals Available
Rentals Wanted
Realty Brokers
Landlord Articles
Tips & Advice
Tenant Histories
Other Areas
Q&A Forum
Free Forms
Essential Forms
Landlord Tenant Law
Join Now
Credit Reports
About Us
Site Help
|