Correction - Landlord Forum thread 216684

Correction by OK-LL on January 29, 2011 @21:17

"...SD or the time..." s/b SD for the time

[ Reply ] [ Return to forum ]

Re: Correction by Anonymous on January 30, 2011 @04:41	[ Reply ]

You are wrong. If the statute doesn't forbid mailing notices by certified mail it is allowed(I don't know any that do). The fact that the OP ignores the certified mail notices left by the post office is the OP's problem.

Re: Correction by Anonymous on January 30, 2011 @04:49	[ Reply ]

Also mailing refers to anything mailed. A letter sent RRR is mailed. That is clear and clearly fullfills the requirement.

First Class Mail Options by ERIC on January 30, 2011 @09:15

[ Reply ]

Cerified mail and Return Receit Requested are both just options of First Class mail.

They still both require first class mail stamp.

Maybe the OP has reasons why they ignored the PO notices and did not want to pick up the mail?

Re: Correction by OK-LL on January 30, 2011 @10:48	[ Reply ]

Guess this is a local decision -- I've had CRR tossed when not specifically required because it increases the difficulty of receipt because the recipient must go to the PO or be present when mail is delivered, neither of which is the case with regular US Mail.

Re: Correction by Anonymous on January 30, 2011 @11:31	[ Reply ]

You really think a judge is going to throw out a notice when the post office leaves notice of mailing and who it is from and the reciever just chooses to ignore the notice, that the judge will just treat the notice as if it never happened? I don't know where you've seen a judge say its acceptable, but I would think any judge with all their marbles in tact would say its not