Re: companion animals - Landlord Forum thread 230147

Re: companion animals by JD-NY on August 3, 2011 @19:16

There was no false pretense because she didn't neglect to dislose anything by law she was reuired too.

[ Reply ] [ Return to forum ]

Re: companion animals by Jake on August 3, 2011 @20:21	[ Reply ]

If you will actually read my post I did not say anything about false pretenses. I am just sick of tenants claiming to be so emotionally fragile that they need a snapping lap dog to make it through the day.

Re: companion animals by Bunny MAGIC on August 4, 2011 @16:34	[ Reply ]

I think it was false pretenses because of a deliberate omission. She may have followed the letter of the law about what she disclosed, but she pulled a sneaky and underhanded thing to get what she wanted.