Re: Legacy tenant with pit bull - Landlord Forum thread 236684

Re: Legacy tenant with pit bull by A.T.SF (CA) on October 5, 2011 @19:55

Your insurance carrier has given you the perfect reason for addressing the issue with this tenant...they will not cover your liability for this breed of domesticated animal.
In recent years the appellate courts in California have allowed landlords to issue a notice of potential dangerous animal. Jendralsky v. Black San Francisco where a married couple ( Criminal Defense Attorneys) owned 2 Presa Canario
Mastiffs that malled a neighbor to death in the hallway of the apartment building because she was wearing a cologne that insighted the dogs. You can give the tenant a choice to stay and rid of the dog or move giving the tenant 60 day notice.

[ Reply ] [ Return to forum ]

Re: Legacy tenant with pit bull by Jake on October 5, 2011 @21:01	[ Reply ]

"Mastiffs that malled a neighbor to death because she was wearing a cologne that insighted the dogs." It was a little more than a cologne. These were vicious dogs trained to be used by dopers. Yes, they were trained by lawyers for dopers.

Re: Legacy tenant with pit bull by A.T.SF (CA) on October 5, 2011 @21:09	[ Reply ]

Thats true the dogs had been taken by the attorneys from an inmate that had a breeding den for these vicious dogs. But it was found during the trial that the dogs latched onto the woman because she was wearing a cologne with a pheromone agent. And you are also correct that the attorneys defended dopers.

Re: Legacy tenant with pit bull by Jake on October 6, 2011 @18:56	[ Reply ]

The dogs part of a partnership with a prison inmate. The lawyers were not taking in homeless animals. About the cologne, does a vicious dog trained to attack really need cologne to set them off?