|
|
Pet addendum
by Anonymous
on February 2, 2018 @18:49
|
No property has ever been improved by a pet.
*Animal has be to on the approved list of my insurance.(No pit or pit x *Renter's insurance and must. *Dog must be licensed (which covers vaccinations and neutering requirements). *I charge a $250 pet fee which is non-refundable. *I also charge $25/month more in rent.
This all aligns with local apartment complexes. It is so stated on the original lease which has a place to initial that they understand even IF they don't have pets when they move in. In the same section they initial a 24-point statement __°NO PETS __°I DO NOT HAVE A PET That way a judge knows there were no pets at move in and they knew the associated fees and costs if later a pet is brought in. I evicted a gal for bringing in a puppy, signing the addendum and then deciding to just not pay the fee or the rent.
At court, she claimed I was retaliating against her because of the dog/that I knew she had a dog. The judge asked her if she had initialed the I DO NOT HAVE A PET line. And was that her initials on the section that outlined the requirements FOR a pet.
|
[
Reply
]
[
Return to forum
]
|
|
|
Look-up
Associations
Attorneys
Businesses
Rentals Available
Rentals Wanted
Realty Brokers
Landlord Articles
Tips & Advice
Tenant Histories
Other Areas
Q&A Forum
Free Forms
Essential Forms
Landlord Tenant Law
Join Now
Credit Reports
About Us
Site Help
|